Skip to content

The gain you are allowed to move, and where it has to go

A twenty-year holding is sold and the long-term gain is ₹60 lakh. Somebody at the family lunch says put it into capital gains bonds within six months. That route is not open to this gain at all, and the one that is open needs ₹80 lakh rather than ₹60 lakh — a difference that decides whether the exemption is the whole gain or three quarters of it.

Market BasicsAdvanced14 min read
Browse Market Basics(113)

A holding built over twenty years is sold. The net proceeds are ₹80 lakh, the cost was ₹20 lakh, and the long-term gain is ₹60 lakh — larger than anything the household has dealt with before. At lunch, a relative who sold a plot in 2019 offers the advice that worked for him: put the gain into capital gains bonds within six months and it is exempt. That route is closed to this gain, because the provision behind it names the asset the gain must come from and shares are not on the list. A different provision is open, and it will exempt the whole ₹60 lakh — but only if ₹80 lakh goes into the new asset, not ₹60 lakh. Invest ₹60 lakh and three quarters of the exemption arrives. The gap between those two outcomes is a single word in a provision nobody at the table has read.

Think of it like this
The window that only takes one kind of document

At the sub-registrar's office each window handles one specific category of document. Stand at the window for agricultural transfers with a perfectly drafted flat conveyance and nothing happens — not because your papers are deficient, and not because the clerk is unhelpful, but because the window is defined by the document rather than by how deserving the applicant is. You can be entirely in the right and still be at the wrong counter, and the only remedy is to find out in advance which counter takes what.

In the market

Each capital gains exemption is a counter of exactly this kind. Every one of them names two assets — the asset the gain must have come from, and the asset the money must go into — plus how much has to go in and by when. Four conditions, and they are cumulative, but they do not fail in the same way. Get either asset wrong and there is no exemption at all, however deserving the case and however much money went in, because the provision was never open to that gain: you are at the wrong counter. Get the amount wrong and the claim does not fail, it shrinks in proportion — which is the quieter failure of the two, and the one people discover a year later.

The three provisions, and the pair of assets each of them names

The provisionThe gain must come fromThe money must go intoHow much has to be reinvested
Section 54A long-term residential houseOne residential house in India — with a once-in-a-lifetime option of two, available only where the gain is within a prescribed limitThe gain. Reinvest the gain and the whole of it is exempt; the rest of the sale proceeds are yours to keep
Section 54FAny long-term asset other than a residential house — listed shares, mutual fund units, gold, landOne residential house in IndiaThe [[net consideration]], which is the whole sale value less the expenses of the transfer. Invest part of it and the exemption is proportionate
Section 54ECLong-term land or building, and nothing elseSpecified bonds — the ones the market calls capital gains bonds — with a five-year lock-inThe gain, subject to a prescribed annual ceiling that is well below the size of many property gains
Worked example
A ₹60 lakh equity gain, reinvested in full and reinvested in half
Listed shares sold for ₹80 lakh net; cost ₹20 lakh; long-term gain ₹60 lakh
The gain, and the route available to itThe gain came from shares, which is a long-term asset other than a residential house. Section 54 is unavailable because the source was not a house; section 54EC is unavailable because the source was not land or a building₹60,00,000, and section 54F
The figure the provision measures againstThe whole sale value less the expenses of the transfer — not the ₹60,00,000 of gain. This is the number that does the workNet consideration of ₹80,00,000
Case one: ₹80,00,000 into a residential houseThe entire net consideration has been invested, so the entire gain is exempt. Note that ₹80 lakh of cash had to be found for a ₹60 lakh gainThe whole ₹60,00,000 exempt
Case two: ₹40,00,000 into a residential houseHalf the net consideration invested exempts half the gain. The remaining ₹30,00,000 is a taxable long-term gainExemption ₹60,00,000 × 40 ÷ 80 = ₹30,00,000
The instinctive figure, and what it actually buysSixty over eighty is three quarters, so three quarters of ₹60,00,000. Somebody who reinvested "the gain" because that is what the phrase suggests has left ₹15,00,000 taxable without knowing it₹60,00,000 invested gives ₹45,00,000 exempt
The same ₹60,00,000 gain, had it come from selling a houseTwenty lakh less money out, identical result. The difference is entirely which provision the source asset put you inSection 54 — ₹60,00,000 reinvested exempts ₹60,00,000
And had it come from selling a plot of landBonds within six months, up to the prescribed ceiling, with a five-year lock-in — and section 54F remains available too, so land is the source asset with the most routes out of itSection 54EC becomes available as well
One gain of the same size produced three different sets of options depending on nothing but what had been sold. The arithmetic here is straightforward and the trap is linguistic: "reinvest the gain" is correct under section 54 and wrong under section 54F, and the wrong version costs a quarter of the exemption on these figures. The figures themselves are illustrative and the conditions summarised here are not the whole of either provision — both carry ceilings, ownership tests and clocks, and whether any of it applies to a particular transaction is a question for a chartered accountant with the actual dates in front of them. What is worth carrying away without any professional help is the shape: find which provision your source asset opens, then read what that provision asks you to invest.

The conditions that disqualify people who have done everything else right

  • Section 54F asks how many houses you already own. The exemption is not available to somebody who owns more than one residential house, other than the new one, on the date of the transfer. Read that against who actually has a large equity gain: a settled household in its fifties, often with the flat it lives in and a second one inherited or bought years ago. The provision is least available to precisely the profile most likely to need it, and the test is applied on the date of the transfer, which has already passed by the time anybody looks the rule up.
  • And it asks what you buy next. Buying another residential house within two years of the transfer, or constructing one within three, withdraws the exemption. The new house is meant to be the reinvestment, not the first of several.
  • Selling the new house too soon undoes it. Transfer the new house within three years and the exemption is reversed — under section 54F the amount earlier exempted is brought to tax as a long-term gain of the year in which the new house is sold, and under section 54 the same result is reached by reducing the cost of the new house by the gain that was exempted.
  • There is a ceiling on how much of the new house counts. The cost of the new residential property that may be taken into account for both section 54 and section 54F is capped, at a figure introduced to stop the provisions being used on very large transactions. It is high enough not to concern most households and low enough to matter to some.
  • The house has to be in India, and it has to be residential. A commercial property, a plot with no house on it, or a house abroad will not do, however much money goes into it.

The deadline that is not the purchase deadline

This is the single commonest way the exemption is lost by somebody who did eventually buy the house, and it catches people because it is a deadline for the money rather than for the purchase. The purchase window is generous — a house bought within a year before the sale or two years after it, or constructed within three years. The return, however, has to be filed long before that window closes, and the law will not let a claim rest on an intention.

What has to happen, and in what order
  1. 1
    The asset is sold and the gain arises

    The clock on the reinvestment window starts here, and so does the clock on the tax year the gain falls into. Those are two different clocks and they run at very different speeds.

  2. 2
    The return for that year becomes due

    Ordinarily a few months after the year ends — long before a two-year purchase window or a three-year construction window has run out.

  3. 3
    Anything not yet spent goes into the scheme account, before that due date

    The unutilised amount must be deposited in a Capital Gains Account Scheme account with a bank before the due date for furnishing the return. It is a specific kind of account opened for this purpose, not an ordinary savings account with the money sitting in it, and the deposit is what preserves the claim.

  4. 4
    The money is withdrawn from it to pay for the house

    Within the same purchase or construction window. The account is a holding pen with the deadline attached to getting the money in, not to getting it out.

  5. 5
    Whatever is left unused at the end of the window is taxed

    The unutilised balance becomes a capital gain of the year in which the period expires. The exemption was never lost on the part that was used — only on the part that was not.

What the two house-based provisions actually ask of you
Section 54 — you sold a house
  • Only the gain has to be reinvested, so the return of your own capital stays with you
  • No restriction on how many other houses you already own
  • A once-in-a-lifetime option to spread it across two houses, where the gain is within the prescribed limit
  • The new house must be held for three years, or the exemption comes back through a reduced cost
Section 54F — you sold shares, units, gold or land
  • The whole net consideration has to be reinvested, and a shortfall reduces the exemption proportionately
  • Not available if you own more than one other residential house on the date of the transfer
  • One house only, and buying another within two years withdraws the exemption
  • The new house must be held for three years, or the exempted gain is taxed in the year it is sold
Check yourself

You sell listed shares for a net consideration of ₹50 lakh, on which the long-term gain is ₹30 lakh, and you invest ₹30 lakh in a residential house within the permitted window. How much of the gain is exempt under section 54F?

◆ Checkpoint

Module checkpoint: when the tax law disagrees

5 questions. Answers are revealed once you submit all of them.

1.You hold 300 shares bought in 2012 at ₹120. The highest quoted price on 31 January 2018 was ₹500. You sell at ₹450. What is the long-term result?

2.A fund of funds invests entirely in a domestic Nifty 50 index fund, which in turn holds the fifty constituent shares. Is the fund of funds an equity-oriented fund for income-tax purposes?

3.Your uncle gifts you shares he bought in 2016 for ₹2,00,000, worth ₹6,00,000 on the day of the gift. What is your cost of acquisition, and is the receipt itself taxable?

4.Which of these describes the clubbing position accurately, for shares gifted within a family?

5.You sell listed shares for a net consideration of ₹1 crore with a long-term gain of ₹40 lakh, and you intend to buy a flat. You find one eighteen months later and buy it for ₹1 crore, well inside the window. Why might the exemption still fail?

0 of 5 answered
Simple bhasha mein
Kaagaz sahi, khidki galat

20 saal ki holding bechi: net ₹80,00,000, cost ₹20,00,000, long-term gain ₹60,00,000. Rishtedaar bola "6 mahine mein capital gains bonds mein daal do, exempt ho jaayega". Woh galat nahi hai — woh doosre sawaal ka jawab de raha hai. Section 54EC ke bonds sirf zameen ya building ke gain pe milte hain, share ke gain pe nahi. Share ke gain ke liye jo khidki khulti hai woh Section 54F hai: paisa ek residential house mein. Aur yahin woh ek shabd hai jo sab tay karta hai — Section 54 mein (ghar bech kar ghar) sirf gain lagana hota hai, par 54F mein poora net consideration lagana padta hai. Matlab: ₹80,00,000 ghar mein lagao → poora ₹60,00,000 exempt. Sirf ₹60,00,000 lagao, kyunki "gain lagana hai" aisa lagta hai → 60/80 = 3/4 → ₹45,00,000 exempt, ₹15,00,000 pe tax. ₹40,00,000 lagao → ₹30,00,000 exempt. Aur wahi ₹60 lakh ka gain agar ghar bechne se aaya hota, toh Section 54 mein ₹60,00,000 lagane se hi poora exempt — ₹20 lakh kam paisa, wahi result. Do shart jinpe achhe-bhale log haar jaate hain. Ek: 54F unko nahi milta jinke paas transfer ke din ek se zyada doosra residential house ho — aur bada equity gain aksar unhi ke paas hota hai jinke paas do flat hain. Do, aur yeh sabse zyada maarti hai: ghar khareedne ki chhoot 2 saal ki hai (banane ki 3 saal), par jo paisa us saal kharch nahi hua woh return ki due date se pehle Capital Gains Account Scheme wale bank account mein jama hona chahiye. 18 mahine baad flat khareed lena bhi us jama na hone ko theek nahi karta — savings account ya FD mein chhua-anchhua pada paisa "scheme mein jama" nahi maana jaata. (Aankde misaal ke liye. Asli case CA ko dikhao.)

What to remember
  • Every capital gains exemption names two assets — the one the gain came from and the one the money goes into — plus an amount and a deadline, and all four are cumulative.
  • Section 54EC bonds are available only on a gain from land or a building, so they cannot be used on a gain from shares.
  • Section 54 asks you to reinvest the gain; section 54F asks for the whole net consideration, and a shortfall cuts the exemption proportionately.
  • Section 54F is unavailable to somebody who already owns more than one other residential house on the date of the transfer.
  • Unspent money must reach a Capital Gains Account Scheme account before the return is due — buying the house in time does not rescue a deposit that was never made.
Finished this lesson?

Mark it done to track your progress through the curriculum.