Strip a stock down to its essence and ask: if I owned it forever, what cash would it ever actually put in my hand? For a pure dividend payer, the answer is its dividends — nothing else. The dividend discount model builds a valuation on exactly that idea, and its simplest form, the Gordon growth model, is one equation you can run on the back of an envelope.
A share is the present value of its dividends
The DDM says a share is worth every future dividend, discounted back to today at the return you require for the risk. Adding up an infinite stream of dividends sounds impossible, but if you assume they grow at a constant rate forever, the maths collapses to the Gordon growth formula: value = next year’s dividend ÷ (required return − growth rate). Two inputs — how much return you demand, and how fast the dividend grows — do all the work.
Start with zero years of faster growth to reproduce this example, then add a faster first stage and watch how much of the value sits after the forecast.
A company reinvests all its profit, pays no dividend, and returns cash only through occasional buybacks. Why is the dividend discount model the wrong tool here?
Agar share hamesha rakho, cash sirf dividend se aata hai — toh share ki keemat = saare future dividend, aaj ke value mein. Gordon formula: agle saal ka dividend ÷ (chaahiye return − growth). ₹10 ÷ (12%−6%) = ₹167. Par growth 7% karo toh ₹200 — ek point mein 20% jhatka! Do input hi sab kuch hilaate hain. Sirf stable, badhte dividend wali company pe chalta hai — jo kuch nahi deti ya buyback karti, uspe bekaar.
- The dividend discount model values a share as the present value of all its future dividends.
- The Gordon growth form: value = next year’s dividend ÷ (required return − growth rate).
- The valuation is highly sensitive to the required return and the growth rate.
- It only works for companies with steady, predictable, growing dividends.
- For non-payers and buyback-focused firms, use a DCF or earnings-based model instead.
Mark it done to track your progress through the curriculum.
Common questions
Short, direct answers to what people ask about this topic.
- what is the dividend discount model
- The dividend discount model, or DDM, values a stock as the present value of all the dividends it is expected to pay in the future. The logic is that if you hold a share forever, the only cash it ever returns to you is its dividends, so the share is worth those future payments discounted back to today at your required rate of return. It is the purest expression of the idea that a stock’s value comes from the cash it hands its owners, and it underlies most other valuation methods even when they do not mention dividends explicitly.
- what is the gordon growth model
- The Gordon growth model is the simplest usable form of the dividend discount model. It assumes a company’s dividend grows at a constant rate forever, which collapses the infinite stream of future dividends into a single tidy formula: value equals next year’s dividend divided by the required return minus the growth rate. That one equation lets you value a stable, dividend-paying company on the back of an envelope, which is why the Gordon growth model is the version most people mean when they talk about the DDM in practice.
- how do you value a stock with the dividend discount model
- Using the Gordon growth version, you take the expected dividend one year out, divide it by the difference between your required rate of return and the dividend’s long-term growth rate, and the result is the estimated fair value per share. For instance, a ₹10 dividend, a 12% required return and 6% growth gives 10 ÷ (0.12 − 0.06) = ₹166.67. The hard part is not the arithmetic but choosing a sensible required return and a growth rate the company can genuinely sustain forever.
- what are the limitations of the dividend discount model
- The model only works for companies that pay steady, predictable and growing dividends, so it is useless for firms that pay nothing, buy back shares instead, or have erratic payouts — which rules out most young and high-growth companies. It is also extremely sensitive to its two key inputs: small changes in the required return or the growth rate swing the valuation wildly, and if the assumed growth ever approaches the required return the formula breaks down. It is a clean tool for stable dividend payers and a misleading one for everything else.