Skip to content
Fundamental Analysis

Accruals: the gap between profit and cash, as a number

Everyone says to compare profit with cash flow. This is how you turn that instinct into a ratio you can screen on — and one of the better-documented predictors of disappointment.

Fundamental AnalysisAdvanced13 min read
Browse Fundamental Analysis(169)

Profit is an opinion; cash is a fact. That line gets repeated constantly and almost never operationalised. The difference between the two has a name — accruals — and a company's accruals can be measured, compared against its peers and tracked over time. Companies with high accruals have systematically underperformed, in study after study, across markets.

Think of it like this
The shopkeeper's two books

A shopkeeper keeps a ledger of everything sold and a cash box of what has actually been received. In a good month the two roughly agree. When the ledger keeps growing and the box does not, he has been selling on credit — and whether that is a growing business or a growing problem depends entirely on whether the credit gets paid.

In the market

The income statement is the ledger, the cash flow statement is the box, and accruals are the gap. A large and widening gap is not fraud; it is a question that needs an answer.

Measuring it

Accrual ratio = (Net profit − Cash flow from operations) ÷ Average total assets
Net profit
Profit after tax, from the income statement
Cash flow from operations
From the cash flow statement, before capex
Average total assets
The mean of opening and closing total assets, to scale for size

Example: Profit ₹520 crore, operating cash flow ₹180 crore, average assets ₹4,000 crore: (520 − 180) ÷ 4,000 = 8.5%. Sustained above roughly 10% deserves a proper explanation.

Accrual ratioReading
NegativeCash exceeds reported profit. Usually excellent — common in subscription and advance-payment businesses
0 to 5%Normal. Profits are converting to cash at a healthy rate
5 to 10%Worth understanding. Often growth consuming working capital, which is benign if it is temporary
Above 10%, sustainedA real question. Something is being recognised as profit that has not arrived as cash
Rising for several yearsThe pattern that matters far more than any single year's level

What actually causes a gap

Benign and less benign
Usually fine
  • Rapid growth funding receivables and inventory — check whether it reverses when growth slows
  • Milestone-based billing in projects and infrastructure
  • A genuine seasonal build ahead of a festival quarter
  • A one-off provision reversal or an asset sale booked above cash received
Worth investigating
  • Receivable days climbing faster than revenue, year after year
  • Inventory rising while revenue is flat — output nobody bought
  • Revenue recognised on percentage-of-completion for projects that keep slipping
  • Repeated "other income" that never appears in operating cash flow
  • Capitalising costs that peers expense

Why the effect persists

The accrual anomaly has been documented since the 1990s and has not disappeared, which is unusual for a published effect. The explanation offered is that investors fixate on the earnings number and do not decompose it — treating a rupee of profit from cash and a rupee from a receivable as equally durable, when the second is far more likely to reverse.

Worked example
Two companies, the same profit
Both report ₹300 crore of net profit on ₹2,500 crore of assets
Company A: operating cash flowMore cash than profit₹340 crore
Company A: accrual ratioNegative. Profits are backed by cash and then some−1.6%
Company B: operating cash flowUnder a third of reported profit₹95 crore
Company B: accrual ratioA large share of profit has not arrived8.2%
Where B's gap sitsRevenue grew 14% over the same periodReceivables up 61%
What the screener showsAnd two very different businessesIdentical P/E, identical growth
A screener sorting on earnings cannot tell these apart. The accrual ratio can, takes two numbers from statements you already have open, and is one of the few checks that is both quick and genuinely predictive.
Check yourself

Over five years a company reported ₹1,400 crore of cumulative profit and ₹520 crore of cumulative operating cash flow. What does that suggest?

Simple bhasha mein
Dukaandaar ki do kitaabein

Ek bahi mein sab bikri likhi hai, ek golak mein jo asal mein aaya. Achhe mahine mein dono lagbhag milte hain. Bahi badhti rahe aur golak na bhare, matlab udhaar pe bik raha hai — aur woh growth hai ya museebat, yeh is baat pe hai ki udhaar wapas aata hai ya nahi. Yahi accrual hai, aur isko naapa ja sakta hai.

What to remember
  • Accruals = profit minus operating cash flow, scaled by average total assets.
  • The multi-year trend matters far more than any single year.
  • Cumulative cash flow ÷ cumulative profit over five years is the quick version.
  • High accruals predict disappointment across markets and have done for decades.
  • The ratio does not work in its usual form for lenders — use provisioning instead.
Finished this lesson?

Mark it done to track your progress through the curriculum.

Common questions

Short, direct answers to what people ask about this topic.

accrual ratio meaning in fundamental analysis
The accrual ratio is net profit minus cash flow from operations, divided by average total assets — it measures how much of a company’s reported profit has not yet arrived as cash. Profit of ₹520 crore against ₹180 crore of operating cash flow on ₹4,000 crore of average assets works out to 8.5%. Scaling by assets is what lets you put a small company and a large one on the same axis.
the gap between reported net profit and cash flow from operations is called
Accruals. They are the part of reported profit recognised on the income statement but not yet received in cash — revenue booked against a receivable, inventory built but unsold, or a cost pushed into a later period. Divided by average total assets, that gap becomes the accrual ratio, and high accruals have been documented as a predictor of subsequent disappointment across markets since the 1990s.
how do I check whether a company’s profits are backed by cash
Add five years of cash flow from operations and five years of net profit, then divide the first by the second. As a working rule for a mature business, above roughly 0.8 says the reported earnings turned into money and below about 0.6 says a large share of half a decade of profit never did. Growth can explain a gap for a year or two; it cannot explain most of five years.
what accrual ratio is considered high
Sustained above roughly 10% is the level that deserves a proper explanation, with 5 to 10% worth understanding and 0 to 5% normal. A negative ratio — more cash coming in than profit reported — is usually a good sign and is common in subscription and advance-payment businesses. The multi-year trend matters far more than any single year, since a capital goods company with milestone billing will look volatile for entirely legitimate reasons.
does the accrual ratio work for banks and NBFCs
Not in its usual form, because for a lender the act of lending is itself an operating activity, so operating cash flow tracks loan book growth rather than earnings quality. For banks and NBFCs the equivalent checks are provisioning against gross non-performing assets and how restructured loans have been classified.