EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Every word after "before" describes something the company genuinely pays. It has one legitimate use — comparing the operating performance of businesses with different debt loads and tax positions — and it has been stretched into a proxy for cash flow, which it is not.
A driver earns ₹90,000 in fares and spends ₹40,000 on fuel and food. He tells you he made ₹50,000. He has not mentioned the ₹18,000 loan instalment on the car, or that the car will need replacing in four years and nothing is set aside for it.
That ₹50,000 is EBITDA. It is a real and useful number about the driving. It is not what he has, and a business that reports only EBITDA is usually the one where the difference matters most.
What gets excluded, and whether it is real
| Excluded | Is it a real cost? | When excluding it is fair |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | Entirely real, paid in cash | When comparing two companies with different capital structures |
| Tax | Entirely real, paid in cash | When comparing across jurisdictions or tax holidays |
| Depreciation | Non-cash today, but the asset does wear out and must be replaced | Almost never, for a capital-intensive business |
| Amortisation | Non-cash; sometimes genuinely an accounting artefact of an acquisition | Sometimes fair — this is the most defensible exclusion |
The gap, made visible
"Adjusted" EBITDA
The refinement to watch for is a further layer of exclusions: one-off costs, restructuring, share-based payments, "pre-Ind AS 116" presentations. Each individual adjustment may be defensible. The pattern is not.
- Share-based payment excluded as "non-cash" — but the shares are real, they dilute you, and the employees would want salary instead.
- Restructuring costs excluded as "one-off" — for the fourth consecutive year, which makes them an operating cost with a temporary name.
- Pre-Ind AS 116 EBITDA presented alongside the reported figure, so lease costs vanish again. Convenient for a retailer or an airline; not a description of the business.
- "Normalised" for an unfavourable quarter while a favourable one is presented unadjusted. The asymmetry is the signal.
Two companies both report ₹300 crore EBITDA. One is a software services firm, the other an airline. What is the main reason those numbers are not comparable?
Naabbe hazaar ki sawaari, chaalis hazaar tel aur khaane ka — bhaiya kehte hain pachaas kamaye. Gaadi ki kisht aur chaar saal baad nayi gaadi ka zikr nahi hua. Wahi pachaas hazaar EBITDA hai. Sach hai, par jeb mein aane wala paisa nahi hai.
- EBITDA excludes four costs, and three of them are paid in cash.
- Depreciation is not a paper entry for anything capital-intensive.
- Cash flow from operations ÷ EBITDA is the conversion test — watch it across eight quarters.
- Every self-defined "adjusted" measure should be reconciled to an audited number.
- The gap between EBITDA and cash is largest exactly where EBITDA is quoted most.
Mark it done to track your progress through the curriculum.
Common questions
Short, direct answers to what people ask about this topic.
- ebitda meaning in share market
- EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation — a company’s operating profit measured before those four costs are taken out. It exists for one comparison in particular: two businesses with different debt loads and tax positions can be judged on their operating performance alone. Interest and tax are paid in cash every year, and depreciation stands in for machinery that will actually have to be bought again, which is why EBITDA is not a measure of cash.
- ebitda is calculated before deducting
- Interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. You start from revenue, subtract the operating costs of running the business, and stop before those four items. Because it stops there, two companies with identical operations but very different borrowings report similar EBITDA — which is the one comparison the measure was built for and the reason it gets stretched into everything else.
- why is ebitda not the same as free cash flow
- Free cash flow is what remains after interest, tax, the capex needed to keep producing at the same rate, and any cash absorbed by working capital — and EBITDA deducts none of them. For a capital-intensive manufacturer or an airline, the share of EBITDA that survives into free cash flow can be well under half. The gap is widest in exactly the sectors where EBITDA is quoted most.
- what is a good cash flow to ebitda conversion ratio
- Cash flow from operations divided by EBITDA is the standard conversion test, and a figure running consistently around 70–80% or higher is generally read as earnings turning into cash. Persistently below about 50% means something is absorbing it, most often working capital. Read the ratio across eight quarters rather than one, because a single quarter can be distorted purely by the timing of receivables and payables.
- what is adjusted ebitda and why do companies report it
- Adjusted EBITDA is EBITDA with further items stripped out by the company itself — restructuring costs, share-based payments, or lease costs restated on a pre-Ind AS 116 basis. No accounting standard defines it and no auditor signs it, so each company writes its own definition into its filings. The check is to reconcile it back to a statutory figure such as profit after tax or cash flow from operations, both of which are audited.