Skip to content
Fundamental Analysis

PLI, RoDTEP and the profits with an expiry date

Production linked incentives and export remissions are usually booked above EBITDA, so they lift operating margin rather than just the tax line. Each has a tenure printed in a public notification.

Fundamental AnalysisAdvanced13 min read
Browse Fundamental Analysis(169)

A mobile phone assembler's operating margin improves from 3.1% to 5.4% over three years. The improvement is real, it is audited, and roughly two-thirds of it is a cheque from the Government of India under a scheme whose notification states that it runs for five years from a specified base year. The margin is a fact. Extrapolating it past the scheme's end date is an assumption, and the end date is a published one.

Think of it like this
The shop with a rent holiday

A new mall gives a shopkeeper three years rent-free to attract footfall. His monthly accounts look excellent, and they are honestly kept. Anyone valuing the shop in year two on those accounts is valuing a business that will start paying rent in year four, and the lease says exactly when.

In the market

A production linked incentive is the rent holiday. It flows into reported profit, it is entirely legitimate, and its duration is written down in a document anybody can read. The mistake is not counting it — it is counting it forever.

What the schemes actually are

SchemeHow it paysWhere it usually sits
Production Linked IncentiveA percentage of incremental sales of qualifying goods manufactured in India, over a fixed base year, for a defined number of years, subject to a per-applicant ceilingOther operating income, inside revenue from operations
RoDTEPA percentage of free-on-board export value, notified per tariff line with a per-unit value cap, issued as transferable electronic scripsOther operating income, or netted against export costs
State capital subsidyA share of eligible capital expenditure, or a refund of state goods and services tax over a periodDeferred income on the balance sheet, released to profit over the asset's life
Interest subventionA rebate on interest for specified sectors and borrower classesNetted against finance cost, so it sits below EBITDA
Concessional tax rateA lower statutory rate for qualifying companiesThe tax line only — it does not touch operating margin

The accounting, in one paragraph

Ind AS 20 governs government grants. A grant is recognised only when there is reasonable assurance both that the company will comply with the conditions and that the grant will be received. Grants related to income may be presented either as a separate credit or deducted from the related expense — the standard permits both, which is precisely why two companies in the same sector can show the benefit in different places. Grants related to assets are treated differently: Ind AS 20 requires them to be set up as deferred income and released to profit over the asset's life, and does not carry over the option in the international standard to deduct the grant from the asset's carrying amount. The presentation choice that does exist is disclosed in the accounting policies note.

Worked example
Stripping the incentive out
An illustrative electronics manufacturer, FY 2025 figures
Revenue from operationsIncludes other operating income₹12,400 crore
Of which, incentive recognisedDisclosed in the notes as a government grant₹430 crore
Reported EBITDA7.1% of revenue₹880 crore
EBITDA excluding the incentive3.8% of revenue excluding the grant₹450 crore
Scheme tenure remainingFrom the scheme notification and the company's own disclosureTwo more financial years
Peer without a scheme approvalWhich is the like-for-like comparison, not 7.1% against 4.0%EBITDA margin 4.0%
The company is not doing anything improper, and ₹430 crore of real cash is real cash. But the underlying manufacturing margin is 3.8%, and that is the number that has to carry the business from the third year onward. A model that holds 7.1% flat has quietly assumed a scheme extension that has not been announced.

What to check, and where

Five things that are all public documents
  1. 1
    The scheme notification

    It states the incentive rate, the base year, the number of years, the eligibility thresholds and the overall ceiling. Ministry websites and the Gazette carry it. This is the primary source, not a news report about it.

  2. 2
    The amount the company recognised

    Ind AS 20 requires disclosure of grants recognised in the period. Find the rupee figure in the notes and express it as a share of EBITDA.

  3. 3
    Where it was booked

    Other operating income, other income, or netted against an expense. Only the first two are visible; the third means peer margin comparisons are quietly inconsistent.

  4. 4
    Whether it has been received

    Recognised is not received. A large receivable from a government scheme sitting in other current assets, ageing across balance sheet dates, is a working capital item that has to be funded meanwhile.

  5. 5
    What management has committed to

    PLI approval carries investment and incremental-sales obligations. Missing them means forfeiting the year's incentive. The commitments are in the scheme guidelines and often in the concall transcript.

Two ways of holding the same fact
Reading it carefully
  • Compute EBITDA margin with and without the incentive, and label both
  • Note the scheme end date in the same place as your forecast
  • Compare against a peer on the same basis — either both including or both excluding
  • Treat the incentive receivable as a working capital item until it arrives
  • Ask whether the capacity built under the scheme is competitive without it
Reading it loosely
  • Attributing an incentive-driven margin rise to operating leverage
  • Applying an enterprise value to EBITDA multiple to an EBITDA a third of which expires
  • Comparing a scheme beneficiary's margin against a peer who did not apply
  • Assuming the scheme will be extended because similar schemes were
  • Treating a recognised but unreceived incentive as though it were cash
Check yourself

A company's EBITDA margin rose from 4% to 7% over two years. The notes disclose a government incentive of ₹430 crore recognised in other operating income, against revenue of ₹12,400 crore. What is the most accurate reading?

Simple bhasha mein
Teen saal kiraya maaf

Naye mall ne dukaandaar ko teen saal kiraya-mukt de diya taaki bheed aaye. Uska hisaab bahut achha lag raha hai, aur poori imaandaari se likha bhi hai. Par lease mein tareekh likhi hai jis din se kiraya lagega. PLI aur RoDTEP wahi kiraya-chhoot hain — paisa asli hai, galti sirf yeh maanne mein hai ki hamesha milta rahega.

What to remember
  • PLI and RoDTEP usually sit in other operating income, so they lift EBITDA itself.
  • Ind AS 20 permits more than one presentation, so peers may not be comparable.
  • Every scheme has a tenure, a base year and a ceiling in a public notification.
  • Recognised is not received — check the incentive receivable across balance sheet dates.
  • Compute margin with and without the incentive, and label which one you are using.

Common questions

Short, direct answers to what people ask about this topic.

pli scheme meaning for a listed company
A Production Linked Incentive is a government payment to a manufacturer calculated as a percentage of incremental sales of qualifying goods made in India, over a fixed base year, for a defined number of years and subject to a per-applicant ceiling. Listed companies usually book it in other operating income inside revenue from operations, so it lifts EBITDA and operating margin rather than only the tax line. Every scheme has a tenure, a base year and a ceiling printed in its public notification.
rodtep full form
RoDTEP stands for Remission of Duties and Taxes on Exported Products. It rebates embedded duties and taxes on exports as a percentage of free-on-board value, notified line by line against the customs tariff with a per-unit value cap, and is issued as transferable electronic scrips. It replaced the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme from 1 January 2021.
government grants in Indian financial statements are accounted for under
Ind AS 20, which covers accounting for government grants and disclosure of government assistance. A grant is recognised only when there is reasonable assurance both that the company will comply with the attached conditions and that the grant will be received. Grants related to income may be presented either as a separate credit or deducted from the related expense — the standard permits both, which is why two companies in the same sector can show the same benefit in different places.
where is the PLI incentive shown in the profit and loss statement
Most often in other operating income within revenue from operations, which places it above EBITDA and therefore inside operating margin, EBITDA multiples and peer comparisons. Some companies instead net the benefit against the related expense, in which case it never appears as a line of its own. The accounting policies note states which presentation was chosen, and the notes disclose the rupee amount of grants recognised in the period.
how many sectors does the PLI scheme cover
Fourteen, with a combined outlay of roughly ₹1.97 lakh crore announced across the Union Budget 2021-22 and subsequent approvals. They include large-scale electronics, pharmaceuticals, automobiles and components, telecom equipment, textiles, food processing, white goods, solar photovoltaic modules, advanced chemistry cell batteries, speciality steel, drones, medical devices and IT hardware. Each sector has its own notification setting the rate, the base year, the tenure and the ceiling.